cheapbag214s
Post Master
Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 19871
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat 18:48, 31 Aug 2013 Post subject: A Manager Who Couldn't Admit He Was Still Learning |
|
|
A Manager Who Couldn't Admit He Was Still Learning
Sir Philip was the chairman of a large financial institution. He led a comfortable, orderly existence. A dapper man with a fine head of white hair parted on the left,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], he had never been known to raise his voice and was always charming and attentive. Sir Philip exuded an air of calm confidence.
He looked every inch a company chairman. He always wore immaculate pin-striped suits, tasteful ties, gold cuff links, and highly polished shoes. He had an endearing way of gazing at you over the top of his half-moon spectacles. He rose early each morning, let the dogs out,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], showered,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], shaved and dressed before being collected from his home in Berkshire at precisely 07:15 by a chauffeur in a company limousine. Before leaving he would take his wife of 40 years a cup of lemon tea and kiss her fondly on the forehead. He always sat in the back of the car as it cruised effortlessly along the M4, with the reading light on so that he could peruse The Financial Times (ready for him on the back seat) and look at other documents in preparation for the day ahead.
Once at work, Sir Philip would wish the receptionist a cheery good morning, comment favourably on the display of fresh flowers on the counter,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and take the lift to the top floor. His office was spacious with fine views across the City. His breakfast would always be ready on the sideboard muesli with prunes and figs and freshly brewed black coffee. As he ate his breakfast,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], he would skim the financial pages of the broadsheets.
After breakfast,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], his secretary would join him to take dictation. Sir Philip spurned emails and insisted that they were printed out so that he could deal with them along with the other correspondence in his in-tray (a real, not virtual, in-tray made of oak). This was typically old fashioned of Sir Philip. He stood aloof from technological developments. He also,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it has to be said, often found it difficult to connect with younger members of staff. There was one famous occasion at a staff party when a young manager told Sir Philip that he used to work in the finance department at Ford Motor Company based in Dagenham. After a pause,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Sir Philip, who had never been to Dagenham but knew it was beside the Thames,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], enquired in his usual courteous way, fishing in Dagenham? rest of the day would be taken up with interminable meetings during which Sir Philip would behave impeccably. He would listen without interruption, paraphrase, make informative comments and never show any irritation come what may.
Sir Philip also spent a good deal of time mentoring the newly appointed managing director who exhibited some rough edges that Sir Philip was keen to smooth off. During his first few months, the MD had, on a number of occasions, been guilty of making off-the-cuff pronouncements that later had to be retracted. Sir Philip was determined to replace these impetuous tendencies with something more considered, where facts were weighed and pros and cons given careful deliberation. His calm temperament and orderly habits meant that he was admirably qualified to counsel the MD in such matters. The MD, however, was disappointingly stubborn and resistant to Sir Philip persuasions. Despite this, Sir Philip kept at it like water dripping onto granite. His patience was legendary.
One day Sir Philip secretary brought him a letter from a professor of psychology at a nearby university. The letter explained that the department had won a tender to conduct a preliminary enquiry into how top managers developed their skills and talents. In particular, the research would aim to identify the day-to-day experiences that provided the most useful opportunities for work-based learning. Sir Philip was sufficiently intrigued to offer himself as one of the guinea pigs.
A briefing meeting with the professor was arranged. Sir Philip was required to be shadowed by a young psychologist through three working days. The psychologist would keep a detailed log of all the activities that took place during his period of observation. This would be analysed and then,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], armed with this data, the professor would return to interview Sir Philip in order to discover which activities he had learned most from and to collect specific examples of his learned shadowing passed with no snags. Sir Philip was co-operative and helpful throughout the three days and looked forward to hearing what emerged from the log and to the final interview with the professor.
After a couple of weeks, the good professor arrived for the session with Sir Philip. He had a printout listing 12 different activities in descending order based on the percentage of time they had consumed during the three days. Top of the list were the mentoring sessions with the MD, second was a lengthy meeting at the Treasury which had been chaired by the Chancellor in person, third was a board meeting and so on.
The professor congratulated Sir Philip on having such a rich and varied working life and started to probe gently for evidence of learning. Sir Philip was characteristically polite but was adamant that he himself had learned nothing from any of these experiences. When,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], for example, his mentoring sessions were explored, he could cite instances of learning by the MD, but was nonplussed at the suggestion that he too might have gained something from the encounters.
Try as he might, the professor always drew a blank. Sir Philip kept apologising for wasting the professor time, but wouldn budge from his position; he was there to help other people learn and develop, not to learn himself.
After many gallant attempts to extract some evidence of learning from Sir Philip, the professor eventually accepted defeat. As he left, Sir Philip shook him warmly by the hand and said, interesting. I must say that if you could make this learning business more respectable,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], maybe we could do something with it. thought the professor, so that was the problem: Sir Philip couldn bring himself to admit to learning because it wasn respectable.
The more senior you are, the more the pressure is on you to seem wise and omnipotent. Being omnipotent and admitting to learning don mix. I suspect, however, a more fundamental problem: you may well have taken the stance you did with the professor,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], not because you weren learning, but because your learning was subliminal.
Let me explain. The majority of our everyday learning is informal. Something happens it might or might not have been planned and the experience generates some learning. However, precisely what we have learned is often vague and tacit rather than explicit. This is in contrast to formal learning where the whole process is more deliberate and conscious. At the end of a conference or course, for example, it is much easier to articulate some lessons learned than at the end of a busy day doing this and that. Since the professor was exploring your informal learning, the chances are that you hadn got this together in an easily communicable form.
Your reticence with the professor may well have resulted from a combination of (a) having reservations about the wisdom of someone in your position admitting to learning and (b) the difficulties of articulating insights from your informal learning. Overcoming the latter would, I believe, help with the former.
All you need to do to learning that would otherwise be subliminal and inaccessible is to ask yourself at, say,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the beginning of a day or week,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], did I learn yesterday/last week? It is easier to answer this question if you focus your attention on one or two actual incidents and go back over them in your mind. Making a written note of your learned is a discipline that helps to crystallise your learning.
Once you are clear what you have learned, you are in a better position to decide whether or not to share it with other people. The choice is yours. There are two big advantages in sharing your learning with others. Firstly, you are being a role-model that others may emulate. This is admirable since learning is the core competence; the gateway to every other skill and capability people and organisations need. Secondly, people might learn from what you have learned. You may be offering them a ready-made insight that they can adapt and incorporate into their own modus operandi.
相关的主题文章:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
http://www.turniej08fifa08.fora.pl/hyde-park,34/mr-driscoll-s-class-wiki-spun5,6055.html#6367
http://www.ariceptjga.fora.pl/forum-testowe,1/95-in-ot-in-exhibition-before-teams-meet-in-brookl,7105.html#7161
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|